Air Force Academy Naval Academy STARRS Authors West Point

Politics and the Academy Boards of Visitors

An Open Letter to STARRS Members Regarding Service Academy Board of Visitor (BOV) Firings

By Rod Bishop, Lt Gen, USAF (Ret), CEO, STARRS


STARRS was founded out of a desire to protect my alma mater, the United States Air Force Academy, from political intrusion. The Falcon football team, whether knowingly or unwittingly, created a video supporting a political movement. The Black Lives Matter Organization has self-declared that their objectives are derived from Marxist training and goals. Neither I nor many of my fellow graduates could stand by silently to watch the politicization of our beloved institution. We joined forces with Patriots from our sister service academies of West Point and Annapolis to form STARRS. We had a shared desire to get back on track returning the focus of the Academies to developing the best military leaders in the world. We know that this is a pre-eminent requirement to assure national security for our country.


Recently, the White House sent messages to every Republican appointed Service Academy member of the Board of Visitors (responsible for oversight) demanding their resignation by the end of the day. If they did not comply, they would all be terminated. Something like this is unprecedented. The unofficial policy of collegiality and cooperation was born of a desire for bi-partisanship as well as to keep the military non-political. This extremely partisan act is just further proof that the current administration wants politics to dominate the culture within the military.

STARRS deplores having politics of any stripe be a part of our military institutions. It was the fear of tyranny, like the heavy-handed rule of Great Britain, that the founders had in mind when they established our nation. General/President George Washington gave us all a wonderful example of putting the “Republic” above “self interest” and “politics.” I hope President Washington’s legacy and tradition will not be ignored. The following articles highlight details of the inappropriateness of this action taken.

Politics and the Academy Boards of Visitors

By Capt Brent Ramsey, US Navy (Ret)
STARRS Director At Large

10 US Code §8468. Board of Visitors

(a) A Board of Visitors to the Naval Academy is constituted annually of:

(1) the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, or his designee;

(2) three other members of the Senate designated by the Vice President or the President pro tempore of the Senate, two of whom are members of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;

(3) the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, or his designee;

(4) four other members of the House of Representatives designated by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, two of whom are members of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and

(5) six persons designated by the President.

(b) The persons designated by the President serve for three years each except that any member whose term of office has expired shall continue to serve until his successor is appointed.

The public law cited above establishes the Board of Visitors (“BOV”) for the United States Naval Academy. Similar provisions of law establish similar boards for the United States Military Academy and the United States Air Force Academy.  These BOV’s are oversight boards created by Congress to investigate, oversee and make written recommendations about the Academies to the United States House Armed Services Committee, the United States Senate Armed Services Committee and/or the President of the United States. The duties of the BOV’s include the following:

The Board shall inquire into the state of morale and discipline, the curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, fiscal affairs, academic methods, and other matters relating to the Academy that the Board decides to consider.

On February 2, 2021 Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin suspended the three academy BOV’s.  Those boards have been inactive since that date and unable to perform their congressionally mandated duties

On 15 July 2021, Heidi Stirrup filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the suspension of the USAFA BOV. On 17 August 2021, additional plaintiffs were added to that lawsuit, including Congressmen Mark Green and Ralph Norman, four cadets and five of their parents, to challenge also the suspension of the BOV’s at West Point and the Naval Academy.

On 8 September 2021, President Biden demanded all the President Trump appointed members of the BOV’s, including Heidi Stirrup, a member of the USAFA BOV, resign by the close of business that day or be terminated as a member of the BOV at 6 PM that day. Later that day, Sean Spicer, former White House Press Secretary for President Trump, became a plaintiff as a member of the Naval Academy BOV.

The Naval Academy Board of Visitors has been in existence since 1879.  Dozens of Congresses over a 140+ year time span have supported their mission and functions as a necessary oversight body to provide advice and counsel on the well-being of Naval Academy midshipmen.  Yet, in 2021, the current president decided to unilaterally ignore the congressional intent and political balance that spans much of the nation’s history to inject political imbalance into the oversight of the military academies.

When the press inquired as to why such an unprecedented firing of 18 Trump appointees had occurred so abruptly and without any advance warning, the president’s press secretary answered that the president needed members on the boards that were “qualified to serve” and represented “our values.” Apparently General Jack Keane, a former Vice Chief of Staff of the Army, and Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, the former National Security Advisor, were among those the president questioned as being qualified to serve and whose values are somehow not compatible with his.

As a matter of law and prudence, these actions against legally appointed and serving BOV members are troubling.  DoD’s suspension of the academy boards has shut them down completely, thereby preventing any BOV oversight or recommendations since last February at a time when each of the academies has unprecedented problems, including honor scandals, COVID, resistance to mandatory vaccinations, critical race theory teachings, purging of “extremists” defined only as “white supremacists” but not including ANTIFA or BLM, sexual assault and suicides.

It is hard to fathom how DoD legally and morally can justify so blatantly eliminating Congress’ oversight of the academies through its BOV’s, especially when Article I, Section 8, Clause 14 of the U.S. Constitution, provides that “[The Congress shall have the Power . . .] to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.”

Without a doubt, appropriate legal authorities within the administration are aware of court rulings on the matter of BOV tenure.  A recent Supreme Court decision reaffirms, citing two previous Supreme Court decisions, that the US Constitution allows “tenure protection,” meaning that congress can prevent the president from replacing lower-level “inferior officers” appointed by the president who, like members of the BOVs, make recommendations but have little or no authority. Members of the BOVs are not even “inferior officers” as they have no executive authority and can only make recommendations.

Congress passed statutes setting the terms of BOV members. The threshold issue is whether by passing these statutes and setting these terms Congress intended to prohibit the president from removing a presidential appointee allowed by Congress prior to the expiration of the term set by statute.

According to the Supreme Court, the President cannot fire and replace Presidential  appointees before the expiration of their statutory terms if Congress intended to prohibit early termination of presidential appointments to the BOV.  Not allowing these BOV members lawfully appointed by the previous president to serve out their terms set by statute smacks of political gamesmanship and those who put the president up to it should be identified and rooted out of government.

No president of any party should put up with such nonsense.  Not only are the lives and reputations of 18 distinguished Americans needlessly sullied and tarnished, but the important role they have been playing for years to help and attend to the needs of our academies’ cadets and midshipmen has been eliminated, replaced with confusion and acrimony.  The cadets at the U.S. Military Academy must be especially demoralized and confused as the publicly maligned Lt. Gen H.R. McMaster was presented with the Distinguished West Point Graduate award on 11 September.

This attempted removal of lawfully appointed BOV members is another example of politics invading the US military.  This type of influence has no place in the military.  The military must be free of all partisanship in order to do its job of defending the nation.

If the military is swayed by the ebb and flow of politics, election to election, it will irreparably damage its effectiveness as a warfighting organization.  The military should have a single-minded focus on supporting and defending the constitution of the United States and nothing else.

A copy of Heidi Stirrup’s answer to the request that she resign is quoted in full below:

September 12, 2021

Catherine M. Russell
Assistant to the President Director
White House Office of Presidential Personnel

Dear Ms. Russell:

I am responding to your email and letter to me dated September 8, 2021, requesting my resignation as a Member of the Air Force Academy Board of Visitors, and stating that if you have not received that resignation by the close of business on that date, my position with the Board will be terminated effective 6:00 pm on that date. Please be advised that I have not resigned and will not do so. Moreover, I have received no official notification that my position with the Board has been terminated, and therefore consider that it has not been terminated. I understand that the resignations of other academy Board of Visitor members also have been requested and termination of their Board positions also threatened.

These resignation demands and threatened terminations are unprecedented and, I believe, bad policy because they are divisive, destroy the politically balanced structure of the Boards of Visitors as created by Congress and deprive the academies of the diversity of experience, knowledge and perspectives the academies traditionally have had and need in order for the academies to fulfill their missions competently and in a manner reflective of all of the American people.

Moreover, and most importantly, termination of membership on an academy Board of Visitors would be illegal. Congressional statutes expressly provide the dates of expiration for academy Boards of Visitors membership positions. For example, my tenure as a Member of the Air Force Academy Board of Visitors is governed by 10 U.S.C. § 9455(b), (c), which when applied requires that my tenure does not expire until after December 30, 2021.

This result is supported by a recent United States Supreme Court decision reaffirming that Congress can continue to provide “tenure protection,” recognized for decades as valid by the courts, for Presidential appointments of inferior officers with narrowly defined duties, which would include Members of academy Boards of Visitors who have no authority but can only make recommendations and issue reports as narrowly defined by statute. See Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau, 140 S. Ct. 2183, 2192, citing United States v. Perkins, 116 U. S. 483, 6 S. Ct. 449, 29 L. Ed. 700, 21 Ct. Cl. 499 (1886); Morrison v. Olson, 487 U. S. 654, 108 S. Ct. 2597, 101 L. Ed. 2d 569 (1988). Please identify to me any legal authority believed to authorize the termination of my Membership to the Air Force Academy Board of Visitors.

Heidi Stirrup

John Lucas made the following points in his article published in The Federalist on 10 Sep:

– This is not happening by accident. And there is no greater danger to the country than this effort to politicize the military by ensuring that all officers hew to the political party line of this administration.

– Think about that: Those overseeing the education of our future military leaders must align themselves with Joe Biden’s thinking and values.  Scary thought.

One last link is from Richard A. Epstein from the Hoover Institution who writes this opinion piece asserting Biden’s naked power grab.  He concludes that presidential appointees such as service academy board of visitor members do not work for the president.  Rather, they serve on independent boards to simply make recommendations without exercising any authority. Assertions of power such as these firings are decaying our political culture.

Share this post:



We are US military veterans and citizens concerned about the divisive racist and radical CRT/DEI ideology infiltrating the military and seek to stand up and do something about it in order to keep our country safe. Join us in this fight!

Join Mailing List   |   Make a Donation   |   Volunteer  |   Provide Suggestions

Leave a comment about this post in the form below

Leave a Comment