This is in regards to Air Force uses taxpayer money for personnel to travel to pride events in DC, which former Space Force LTC Matthew Lohmeier called attention to.
(Press Release) The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has been using taxpayer dollars to fly service members to Pride events in Washington, D.C.
This is a gross misuse of taxpayer money, as these events have no relation to military training or defense.
The DoD’s limited budget should only be used to ensure that the U.S. military is the most lethal fighting force in the history of the world, not to celebrate the Left’s new civic religion.
U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) and colleagues introduced legislation to ban taxpayer-funded travel to Pride events and sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin regarding the DoD’s misguided priorities.
- “The U.S. military is the top fighting force in the world, and the DoD’s purpose is to ensure it stays that way. Flying service members to Pride events is an insane use of taxpayer money. My colleagues and I are demanding answers on behalf of the American people and introducing legislation to guarantee this doesn’t happen again.” – Senator Rubio
- “Offering free vacations to Democratic political events is in no way a part of the military’s mission. The Biden administration should use its defense dollars to strengthen America and prepare our troops for war, not subsidize trips to political rallies.” – Senator Cotton
- “Using taxpayer money to fund traveling across the country to attend pride events is a brazenly inappropriate misuse of funds. Our military should be focused on killing America’s enemies and keeping Americans safe and secure, not intervening in domestic political and cultural controversies.” – Senator Cruz
- “Congress uses taxpayer dollars to protect our servicemembers who put their lives on the line to defend America. I’m not sure taxpayers would understand why the Department of Defense is using these funds to pay for travel to Pride events.” – Senator Cassidy
The Banning Overspending On Non-Defense Objectives at Gratuitous Gatherings and Learning Events (BOONDOGGLE) Act would ensure that travel and transportation allowances are provided to service members for professional development training only if such training relates to the military occupational specialty of the member.
The BOONDOGGLE Act also bans allowances for events related to the sexual orientation of the member, or that promote the sex, race, or religion of the member as superior or inferior to another sex, race, or religion.
In the letter to Secretary Austin, the senators wrote:
- “The priority and focus of all expenditures should be to safeguard U.S. assets and interests, and anything that does not contribute to that mission is a waste of taxpayer funding.”
- “Strained defense budgets call into question what DAF and the broader DoD are sacrificing in order to fund personnel trips to Washington, D.C. for Pride events that distract from building a more lethal force.”
Senator Rubio was joined in his efforts by Senators Tom Cotton (R-AR), Ted Cruz (R-TX), Steve Daines (R-MT), and Bill Cassidy (R-LA).
The bill text can be found here.
To authorize the payment of a travel or transportation allowance for a member of the uniformed services to travel to obtain professional development training only if such training relates to the military occupational specialty of the member and not to the sex, sexual orientation, race, or religion of the member. . . . .
The full text of the letter can be found here and below:
The Honorable Lloyd Austin
U.S. Department of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20301-1000
Dear Secretary Austin:
We write out of concern over the U.S. Department of the Air Force’s (DAF) use of taxpayer dollars to cover the travel, lodging, and participation expenses for service members and civilians for DAF Pride events held in Washington, D.C.
According to the DAF Office of Diversity and Inclusion, Air and Space Force Commanders have been authorized to utilize unit funds for this purpose for the professional development of service members and civilians.
This is an abuse of taxpayer money, and completely unacceptable.
At a time of global instability and heightened threats against the U.S. and our allies and partners, the U.S. military should not be funding activities that have no direct impact on providing for the national defense.
Within the past several weeks, a Chinese fighter jet flew aggressively close to a U.S. reconnaissance aircraft conducting a lawful operation in the South China Sea, and a Chinese warship cut dangerously close to a U.S. Navy destroyer, threatening a collision.
These incidents should be a wake-up call to the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) that the priority and focus of all expenditures should be to safeguard U.S. assets and interests, and anything that does not contribute to that mission is a waste of taxpayer funding.
Closer to home, strained defense budgets call into question what DAF and the broader DoD are sacrificing in order to fund personnel trips to Washington, D.C. for Pride events that distract from building a more lethal force.
As you recently pointed out in relation to drag show performances on military bases, such activities are “inconsistent with regulations regarding the use of DoD resources.”1
Meanwhile, the U.S. military remains woefully underfunded in areas such as procurement and there exists a critical need to expeditiously rebuild our stockpiles.
Given these facts, it is essential that DAF and DoD refocus and prioritize funding on providing for the common defense.
Given our role in ensuring that DAF and DoD remain responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars, we request answers to the following questions:
• How much funding was expended by the DAF to send Airmen and Guardians to Washington, D.C. for Pride events?
• How many Airmen and Guardians chose travel to Washington, D.C. for Pride events?
• As part of the DAF’s Pride events, the Department hosted a recruiting booth at the D.C. Pride Festival. Can the Department provide an analysis of interest it received at that booth?
• What skills that contribute to professional development does the DAF assess that Airmen and Guardians gained from the Pride events?
• How many total hours did service members and civilians, who attended DAF Pride events in Washington, D.C., spend away from their units?
• What factors contributed to DAF’s determination that such events would enable service members and civilians to “improve professional competency” or “improve management of the Department’s functions and activities” as presented in the DAF memo?
• How much money has the DoD budgeted for Pride month events, broken down by service, and the exact expenditures?
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Bill Cassidy, M.D.