DOD Woke Agenda

12 reasons why military going Electric with their vehicles is a bad idea

Over 4,000 car dealerships sent an open letter to the Biden administration asking to put the brakes on a planned move for cars to go all electric by 2030.

In this Daily Signal article, “Auto Dealers Call on Biden to Hit Brakes on Unrealistic, Unachievable Electric Vehicles Mandate“, the author goes through many problems with electric cars.

Reading the reasons makes one think what a severe disadvantage the military would be in with the push from the political Pentagon policymakers to go green, not to mention our major adversary, China, is where 80% of batteries are made:

From the article:

“. . . . There are reasons that most Americans prefer to buy cars with internal combustion engines. (1) The primary one cited is the difficulty of charging while on long trips or in homes that don’t have charging stations.

Most people who love their EVs recharge them at home overnight. But not everyone has a garage at home. Some live in apartments and homes without garages. (STARRS NOTE: Where would all military people charge their own electric cars, let alone GOVs?)

Many of those people have to rely on charging stations for their EVs if they can’t run extension cords from their residences to the parking lot.

(2) There are few charging stations in rural areas, where driving distances are longer.

Also, (3) while gasoline-powered cars can be refueled in five or 10 minutes at a gas station, recharging an electric vehicle can take 45 minutes or longer for a full charge.

(4) Wait times are longer if someone else is at the charging station, and if some charging stations are out of order.

(5) Most people don’t want to let their EV battery go below 20%, and the charging rate goes down when it is charged over 80%.

In addition, (6) batteries lose range in cold weather. A study by truck manufacturer Autocar shows that electric vehicles lose, on average, a third of their range in the winter, which reduces the typical 240-mile range to 160 miles.

If a heat pump is added to the car, the loss is less, but still, the 240-mile range would shrink to 180.

Only 380 North Dakota residents chose EVs in 2021, and Alaska had just 1,300. (STARRS NOTE: What about the military bases in cold weather states like these?)

(7) New electric vehicles also cost more than gasoline-powered vehicles. The electric version of the base version of the Ford F-150 pickup truck, the best-selling vehicle in America, costs an additional $26,000. And Tesla’s base prices start at about $40,000 for a Model 3 and go up to almost $100,000 for a Model X.

Few Americans can afford these vehicles.

(8) Dealers also cite lack of minerals available for EV batteries as a reason for pausing on the push for electrification.

China has most of the minerals for batteries, and almost 80% of batteries are made in China. China is buying up many of the world’s mines where rare earth minerals used in batteries are found.

(9) The forced push to EVs is making America weaker and China stronger.

Should Biden’s EV goal come to pass, America would become more dependent on China for electric batteries and associated components, rather than using abundant domestic oil and natural gas.

That means sacrificing energy independence.

(10) The Biden administration’s push for EVs is to supposedly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But in order to produce supplies of batteries for EVs and other components, China is increasing its construction of coal-fired power plants.

America has 225 coal-fired power plants (which the Biden administration is trying to put out of business), and China has 1,118 (half of all the coal-fired plants in the world).

Research by Kevin Dayaratna, chief statistician and senior research fellow at The Heritage Foundation, has shown that  (11) even completely eliminating all fossil fuels from the United States would result in less than 0.2 of a degree Celsius in temperature mitigation by the year 2100.

Biden says that EVs will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and that regulations on tailpipe and power plant emissions reduce global warming.

But that’s a fantasy. (12) Emissions will not be reduced until the biggest producers of so-called greenhouse gases—China, India, and Russia—reduce their emissions, which they show no signs of doing. . . . . (read more on Daily Signal)

Share this post:

Leave a Comment