By Bill Gertz and Mike Glenn | Washington Times
The U.S. Military Academy at West Point has removed the words “Duty, Honor, Country” from its mission statement in what some critics say reflects the deepening politicization within the military services under President Biden.
The mission statement until recently included the three words made famous in retired Gen. Douglas MacArthur’s 1962 farewell address to West Point cadets. The storied World War II and Korean War commander died two years later. MacArthur’s address gave new prominence to the motto adopted by West Point in 1898, five years before he graduated from the academy.
Lt. Gen. Steve W. Gilland, West Point superintendent, outlined the new mission statement this week. It says cadets will be grounded in “Army values,” including loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity and personal courage.
The superintendent sent a letter Monday to the “Long Gray Line” and all academy supporters about the change. He noted that it had the approval of Army Secretary Christine E. Wormuth and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George. “Duty, Honor, Country” remains the official motto.
“Duty, Honor, Country is foundational to the United States Military Academy’s culture and will always remain our motto,” Gen. Gilland wrote. The change in the wording of the mission statement was prompted by a requirement to “assess ourselves regularly.”
“Thus, over the past year and a half, working with leaders from across West Point and external stakeholders, we reviewed our vision, mission and strategy to serve this purpose,” he wrote.
“As a result of this assessment, we recommended the following mission statement to our senior Army leadership: ‘To build, educate, train, and inspire the Corps of Cadets to be commissioned leaders of character committed to the Army Values and ready for a lifetime of service to the Army and Nation.’”
The letter ended with “Go Army! Duty Honor Country!”
The change is likely to fan a controversy over the state of the military under Mr. Biden and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin. Republicans in Congress have accused them of imposing “woke” social ideas on the Army and other military services at the expense of patriotic traditions and traditional warfighting values.
Army Col. Terence M. Kelley, an academy spokesman, declined to specify why the three words were taken out of the mission statement other than to note that it was part of an effort for an “evolving” statement.
“Our mission statement has changed over the past century as our motto has remained constant; change does not have to mean woke politics,” Col. Kelley said in an email.
Mottos and ideology
The shift in statement was first disclosed by Armed Forces Press, which quoted information from the MacArthur Society of West Point Graduates, a patriotic group. The society criticized the change as a symptom of a larger problem for the Army and the military as a whole.
“Like in many great institutions in the United States of America, progressive ideology is eroding away at West Point and doing so in a slow but methodical march, co-opting our good intentions through the specter of cultural Marxism,” the group said. “Our adversaries are unscrupulous but sophisticated and very patient.”
Col. Dave Butler, a spokesman for Gen. George, said in a statement that the chief of staff “agreed that the [new] mission statement aligned with the actual mission of West Point” while noting that the phrase “Duty, Honor, Country” had been part of the West Point mission statement only since 1998.
Gen. George “did not see the revised mission statement as removing ‘Duty, Honor, Country’ from the soul of West Point,” Col. Butler said. “It still exists as their motto. It is still prominent in the culture of West Point, and that will never change.”
Meaghan Mobbs, a West Point graduate and former Army officer, called the new mission statement “a warning sign that should make everyone sit up and take notice.”
The statement is an example of the “watering down of the West Point experience,” said Ms. Mobbs, who has worked with veterans organizations and other nonprofits since leaving the military.
“They are saying the quiet part out loud. West Point is losing its comparative advantage,” she said.
“The federal service academies must distinguish themselves from the senior military colleges and broader ROTC.
I believe this is also indicative of the broader challenges facing recruitment and retention within our military.”
MacArthur said in his farewell address that duty, honor, country should be revered values for the Army’s future leaders.
“Those three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be, what you will be,” he said. “They are your rallying point to build courage when courage seems to fail, to regain faith when there seems to be little cause for faith, to create hope when hope becomes forlorn.
“The unbelievers will say they are but words, but a slogan, but a flamboyant phrase,” MacArthur said. “Every pedant, every demagogue, every cynic, every hypocrite, every troublemaker, and, I am sorry to say, some others of an entirely different character, will try to downgrade them even to the extent of mockery and ridicule.”
The MacArthur Society posted briefing slides from a West Point board of visitors meeting on March 7, when Gen. Gilland revealed the plan to revise the mission statement.
The new mission statement is described in the slide as “Army Senior Leader Approved.” It states that the goal is “to build, educate, train and inspire the Corps of Cadets to be commissioned leaders of character committed to the Army Values and ready for a lifetime of service to the Army and Nation.”
The senior leader behind the change was not identified by name.
Retired Army Lt. Col. Joseph Myers, a 1981 West Point graduate, said the change in the mission statement reflects a larger problem of military recruiting and retaining valuable officers.
The problems are the result of emphasizing such policies of diversity, equity and inclusion and critical race theory, he said.
“No matter how the West Point mission statement is crafted, the real question, issue and problem is retention rates of Academy graduates for a lifetime career of service to the Army,” Col. Myers said. “I think the public expects more and better of their investment.”
The focus on nonmilitary values and policies “is likely seriously impacting retention rates and Army officer career inspiration and aspirations,” he said.
First published in Washington Times
Some comments on the article:
“LTG Gilland says “Duty Honor Country” is still the motto, but anybody who has been watching Knows what they are doing. Just like everything else in their “Progressive” agenda, they are moving incrementally in their “fundamental transformation”. Yes, we know Army Values. They are on every NCOER. But if “Duty Honor Country” does not encompass those, I don’t know what does.”
“What was broke in the old mission statement that they had to change it? “Country” shouldn’t be mentioned by global citizens as progs work to erase all borders? We can presume the motto is next to go.”
“This is a sad day. It is a defeat, a retreat, a beginning of the end. Men and women who are charged with the lives of others in the defense of our nation must be held to the highest of human standards. Yes they are but words . . . but at times of decision where life and death are at hand . . . . the simple words should be on that persons lips as a guide to who they are, what their duty is and how to decide. The removal is the attempt to allow for situational ethics, rationalization and political necessity to be on that persons lips . . . .sad, a defeat . . . an unwarranted defeat.”
“When businesses start to fail because of mismanagement, one of the first things the inept management does is develop a new slogan. Apparently, this applies to military academies as well.”
“Who are the stakeholders if not the citizens of our country?”
“”Wokeism” is too kind a word, and also an evasion of the truth. This is cultural Marxism. Democrats hate America.”
Leave a Comment